What we (don’t) know about fok

  • 0

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to give an exemplary summary of the existing linguistic descriptions and lexicographic treatments of the contemporary Afrikaans fok (“fuck”), and other related words, such as befok (fucking A), fokken (fucking), fokkol (fuck-all), and opfok (to fuck up), with a view to formulating a research agenda for Afrikaans swearword research. The article is based on research in the project “What the swearword: Multidisciplinary research on language taboos”.

Two scientific publications, namely Feinauer (1981) and Dekker (1991), and nine Afrikaans monolingual dictionaries that have appeared since 1991 serve as data to sketch a coherent picture of our existing knowledge about fok. Using these sources, all our existing knowledge about fok is extracted and systematically presented in terms of: (1) etymology; (2) part-of-speech distribution; (3) phonetic and phonological aspects; (4) morphological constructions; (5) syntactic constructions; (6) semantic aspects; and (7) pragmatic aspects.

Based on corroborating evidence from Google Books Ngram Viewer, the conclusion is drawn that fok has indeed developed under influence from English fuck (as has been argued by some scholars and dictionaries before), rather than from Dutch fokken. Morphological and syntactic constructions that emerge from these data sources are also formalised, and then presented as a detailed, summative construction network. One of the conclusions is that quantitative data are needed to verify the views, descriptions, and conclusions of these sources (i.e., to verify the construction network with usage data), since none of them is based on corpus or other empirical data.

The article concludes with the view that knowledge about and understanding of swearword constructions and other language taboos can contribute to insights into the human brain, mind, and psyche; human interaction with other people and artefacts (such as computers, literature, legislation, etc.); as well as language usage and language change. Such insights can be gained through usage- and user-based research in descriptive linguistics (specifically corpus-based/-driven, construction-based descriptions); applied linguistics (specifically sociolinguistics, computational linguistics, psycholinguistics, and neurolinguistics); and various disciplines in the cognitive neurosciences.

Keywords: construction grammar; etymology; lexicography; profanity; swearing; vulgar

Lees die volledige artikel in Afrikaans

Wat ons van fok weet (en nie weet nie)

  • 0

Reageer

Jou e-posadres sal nie gepubliseer word nie. Kommentaar is onderhewig aan moderering.


 

Top