Skaars 30 jaar terug het al wat ’n witmens mos sterk geglo got bestaan regtig, is blank en praat Afrikaans, en dat swartes was minderwaardig, of so iets ... maar kyk vandag, SA boom en dit onder swart regering!
En waar is die verwese wittes nou?
Dalk in die jemel by hulle se denkbeeldige Joodse gotjie wat Afrika wou kom oorneem het, ingevoer deur die wittes wat dieselfde idee gehad het ... sjaaim.
Ek onthou ook, so in die 90's was Alan greenspan genoem die slimste mens op aarde!
Hoe anders, die VSA het geld gehad soos water, en sonder om hand uit die mou te steek, maar kyk vandag nè ... VSA is die bankrotste land wat die wêreld ooit gesien het, en Greenspan word nou gebrandmerk as “an asshole in a billion”!!
Honderd jaar terug was Sjina waar die VSA vandag is, bankrot, ons lees op BBC:
In October 1911, China rose up in revolution. Four months later the last emperor had fallen and European moneymen were flocking to Beijing, eager to finance the bankrupt new republic.
In October 2011, another European moneyman headed for Beijing. But Klaus Regling, head of the European Financial Stability Facility, did not go there to lend to China. He was there to borrow, asking China to save Europe from economic disaster.
In just one century, China has gone from financial basketcase to the world's banker, and Europe has made the same trip in the other direction. It is one of the biggest turnarounds in history. How did it happen? And, more to the point, what does it mean?
Merkwaardig huh ... maar waar het dit begin:
But when Europeans lent to China in 1911, they got themselves more than just a stable market. They also got increasing control over China's economy, and through that, over its policies. All the way back to ancient Rome, in fact, rising powers have relied as much on finance as on force of arms to bring rivals to heel.
Does this mean that Europe is committing suicide by sending Klaus Regling to Beijing? Once again, we can learn a lot by looking back 100 years.
In 2011, we are used to reading in the newspapers that China is a crass, corrupt, economic giant, manipulating its currency and rigging the markets to catch up with the West. Back in 1911, though, British newspapers levelled exactly the same charges against the USA. And they were right. Within 50 years, the US had conquered the world's markets and the European empires were gone.
Will dependency on Chinese capital in the 21st Century be equally good?
No one knows, but the signs are not promising. Just last week, Jin Liqun, the supervising chairman of China's sovereign wealth fund, told an al-Jazeera interviewer that Beijing should only lend to Europe if the EU turns itself upside down.
"If you look at the troubles which happened in European countries," said Jin. "This is purely because of the accumulated troubles of the worn out welfare society… The labour laws induce sloth, indolence, rather than hard working." Europe might find Chinese economic hegemony much harder to live with than an American one.
Mmm ... klink vir my daar gaan gewerk moet word, en ek dink die wittes in SA gaan baie binnekort ook daai koue hand van harde werk en harde werklikheid begin voel aan hul eie lywe, die wat nog die leeglê en die swart slawerny geniet, moet dit maar nog geniet, die einde leg voor julle, en dan gaan die skoene dalk aan die ander voete wees ...
Francois Williams