Die EU sirkus rondom die Cyprus sg, 'bailout' waar enigeen met bankrekenings hul spaargeldjies verloor het, laat die enkele paar probleempies van die ANC regering lyk na ’n Sondagskool-vrugtesappie-partytjie!!
Ek het al voorheen uitgespel hoedat die onkundige Wit Westerlinge maar gerus hier in SA kan kom kers aansteek en uitvind presies hoe om ’n land suksesvol te regeer!!
Ek meen, dis absoluut ongelooflik hoe onbevoeg die bankiers en regerings van die EU is!!
Het die mens dan nie basiese rekeningkunde gedoen VOORDAT hulle bankiers word nie???
Ek twyfel hoor!!
Ek meen, Mr Jeroen Disselboom van Nedeland reken selfs dat om mens met spaarekeninge se geldjies te plunder is GEEN probleem nie, en is die regte pad vorentoe!!!
Mmm ... en hier dog ek dis net dagga wat wettig is in Holland ... of is daar dalk ietsie heelwat sterkers in die water daar??
Maar op daai trant, wonner ek ook, hoekom die Witmensies van SA, soos Amanda Gouws bv, wat so tjank oorlat SA kwansuis so kaksleg is, hoekom vat hulle dan nie maar JULLE spaargeldjies oor na die EU toe nie, lekka veilig ivg met SA raait???
Ek meen, ek lees die nuutste Morgan Stanley Research dokument oor die nagmerrie van die Weste se finansies, en ja, indien iemand nog twyfel spel hulle dit uit:
DIE WESTE IS NIE 100% BANKROT NIE, O NEE, HULLE IS 1000% BANKROT!!!
EENDUISEND PERSENT!!!
A few weeks ago, Morgan Stanley Research circulated a short research note with the seemingly technical title ‘Investment Lessons from Financial Repression’. Its content was anything but harmless. Morgan Stanley’s assessment said: "considering all assets and liabilities, sovereigns are highly indebted, if not insolvent”.
The bank’s analysts came to this conclusion by treating governments like corporations, aggregating their current and future assets and liabilities into one single balance sheet. Unlike conventional measures of existing government debt as a percentage of economic output, the inclusion of future tax revenues and government expenditure makes it possible to get a more realistic long-term view of a nation’s economic viability.
The results are shocking. On this calculation, Spain, the United Kingdom, Ireland and Greece all had public debt worth more than 1000 per cent of their current GDP. The US was not far behind at about 800 per cent. Germany and France fared a little better in this calculation, but at more than 500 per cent of GDP their debt positions could hardly be described as reassuring.
The fiscal gap identified by Morgan Stanley is large but not out of line with other projections. Last year, the OECD presented an alternative way at looking at the developed world’s public debt disaster.
The Paris based organisation calculated the changes required in governments’ primary budget balances required to reduce debt to just 50 per cent of GDP by the year 2050. In doing so, they even excluded spending pressures from pension, health and long-term care spending. Despite this omission, the necessary turnaround to make government finances sustainable was enormous. Japan would have to consolidate its public finances by 9.6 of GDP per year, the US by 6.9 per cent and the UK by 5.8 per cent. It is not an exaggeration to say that such large and permanent changes in government spending are unlikely to be achieved in a democracy without risking civil war.
Boston University economist Laurence Kotlikoff, who has conducted extensive research around the US fiscal gap, has been warning for many years that official debt figures do not tell the full story. He recently calculated that the real US debt, including all future revenue and expenditure, now stands at $US222 trillion – not the official $US16 trillion that the fiscal cliff debate was about. This would yield a debt to GDP ratio of just over 1400 per cent – or a very simple conclusion: The US is not fighting bankruptcy; it is already bankrupt.
Shaaim huh!!
Maar wat is die antwoord???
Die Wittes kannie hulself meer help nie, wat nou???
Die klokke lui hard en duidlik...
Francois Williams