Litnet

Die fossielrekord word al meer en meer deurmekaar en weerspreek daardie aanname van darwiniste soos Stephan dit in ’n kommentaar verwoord, naamlik dat sekere fossiele in sekere rotslae voorkom, dat die opeenvolging van daardie lae vasgestel is en dat die oppervlakkigste van die lae fossiele bevat wat soos hedendaagse organismes lyk en die dieper lae ontbreek aan baie fossiele wat herkenbaar in hedendaagse groepe hoort en fossiele bevat van uitgestorwe organismes en die diepste lae fossiele bevat wat relatief eenvoudig of primitief is of geen teken van lewe verklap, nie.

In die proses word die geknoeiery van darwiniste met die datering van fossiele om dit te laat inpas by die darwinistiese model, ook boonop geopenbaar.

“The reality of the geologic column is predicated on the belief that fossils have restricted ranges in rock strata. In actuality, as more and more fossils are found, the ranges of fossils keep increasing … For instance, trilobite-bearing beds are supposed to reflect a time when trilobites were the dominant life form on earth, and dinosaur-bearing beds are supposed to reflect a time when dinosaurs were dominant on the earth. However this view is weakened because the range of fossils from one supposed time period keeps extending and overlapping fossils ostensibly typical of another period of time in the past … When we consider the fact that fossil succession is limited in overall extent, it is another way of stating that there are many fossils which are found at many stratigraphic intervals. In fact, only a minority are confined to rocks attributed to only one geologic period … Since the early days of the acceptance of the standard geologic column, fossils have been turning up in ‘wrong’ places as more and more fossils have been collected, and this process continues to this very day. And even this does not include the numerous instances where fossils are supposed to be reworked from older strata, often with no independent supporting evidence.” – John Woodmorappe.

“You may be surprised to learn that fossils are being found “in the wrong place” all the time. Out of place, that is, compared with the areas, or ranges, shown for them on the geological column … So, it is not surprising that new fossils are regularly found in places where they were previously unknown. For example, sometimes we will find an organism alive-and-well that was ‘extinct’ for ‘millions of years’. These discoveries are no problem for evolutionists; they just extend the range of these animals upward on the geological column.”

Só word data gemanipuleer om die hipotese te pas en nie andersom nie.

“The Wollemi pine is a remarkable example of a living fossil. In recent years a grove of trees was found just 100 kilometres west of Sydney … It was thought to be extinct since the so-called Jurassic period—about 150 million years ago on the uniformitarian timescale. Obviously, the Wollemi pine has not ‘evolved’ over the alleged 150 million years” – Michael Oard

“In May 2005, New Scientist reported that [Timmins in Laos] discovered an animal completely unknown to science … This particular specimen had already been killed, and was destined for the kebab skewer. The creature, a rodent dubbed Laonastes aenigmamus looks like something in between a squirrel and a large rat … In March 2006, Science journal dropped a bombshell, saying that the rodent Laonastes is not new, the journal reported that anatomical comparisons of Laonastes with fossil evidence from the lower Miocene, Shandong Province, China, showed that the creature living in Laos today is actually a surviving member of the Diatomyidae, a group of rodents long thought extinct. ‘Hence,’ says Science, ‘Laonastes “resurrects” a clade of mammals that was formerly thought to have been extinct for more than 10 million years”.

“One of the most infamous of these ‘living fossils’ is the coelacanth fish, once held up to be the ancestor of all land animals and birds, and formerly thought to have died out 65 million years ago. But when fishermen hauled a live coelacanth to the surface from the deep ocean waters off Madagascar, evolutionists saw that it was not a transitional form … The coelacanth and Laonastes are not the only [extinct] organisms living today. The rare South American opossum-like marsupial Dromiciops gliroides is a member of a ‘clade’ (Microbiotheria) earlier thought to have become extinct more than ten million years ago. And the fossil ant Gracilidris, thought to have died out 15–20 million years ago, has recently turned up alive and well in Paraguay, Brazil and Argentina. These and the hundreds of other known examples of ‘living fossils’ (e.g.)” – Dr. David Catchpoole.

Daar is blykbaar honderde sulke voorbeelde, soos byvoorbeeld die tuatara, salmander, perdeskoenkrap, Wollemi den, ens., wat die darwiniste se aanspraak, totaal verongeluk.

Trouens, boonop is die datering van rotslae is só onbetroubaar en aanvegbaar dat daar nie op staatgemaak kan word, nie.

Groete,
Kobus de Klerk