Litnet

Darwinistiese randomization en natuurlike seleksie, oftewel, ewekansigheid by wyse van toevallige natuurlike seleksie en mutasie, onder die soeklig.

Die probleemstelling:

“Codes used within the body are used for communication between different cells or communications from one part of a cell to another part of that same cell. This communication is by means of chemicals, such as proteins. So, when cells communicate, each chemical communicator carries a different message, or several different messages. These chemical communicators must be constructed in the proper quantity and at the proper time in order for them to be used effectively. The blueprints for the chemical communicators are contained in the arrangement of the atoms of a molecule of DNA. DNA is the paper on which the blueprints for chemicals and genes are written. The only known function of DNA is to record information.

Each DNA molecule contains approximately three billion instructions. However, recent research has show that the codes contained in DNA define the structure of approximately 21,000 separate proteins. The instructions for these 21,000 proteins comprise only 7% – 26% of all of DNA. Darwinian theorists did not know how the remaining 74% – 93% of the DNA was used, so they referred to it as "junk." They argued that the existence of this "junk" was evidence of evolution and argued that the "junk" was left over from previous incarnations of humans. New discoveries have shown that the junk DNA is not junk at all, but is transcribed as RNA and contains instructions for the application of other chemicals that DNA encodes. Rather than "junk" it is the tip of an iceberg of vast complexities and interactions between chemicals that have defined and encoded in the DNA molecule.

The threshold problem for Darwinists is that the codes contained in the DNA molecule have no direct relationship whatever with the proteins that they are used to make. The "writing" in the DNA molecule is not a prototype for the proteins that are produced from it – it is a language, a digital code that means something. It does not contain a "sample" of the protein that it produces. All it is, is code written with 24 specific letters formed by only four different kinds of groups of atoms, codes that another portion of the same cell has been constructed to understand. This is extremely complex, extremely comprehensive communication with a language. Where did the language come from? Besides the obvious problem of concluding that three billion instructions simply happened over the course of time by a series of extremely fortunate accidents, there are other significant problems for Darwinists to overcome. The threshold problem for Darwinists is that the codes contained in the DNA molecule have no direct relationship whatever with the proteins that they are used to make. The "writing" in the DNA molecule is not a prototype for the proteins that are produced from it – it is a language, a digital code that means something. It does not contain a "sample" of the protein that it produces. All it is, is code written with 24 specific letters formed by only four different kinds of groups of atoms, codes that another portion of the same cell has been constructed to understand. This is extremely complex, extremely comprehensive communication with a language. Where did the language come from?

The next problem is to explain how the proteïen production mechanism chooses which protein to produce and when, and after it chooses which protein to produce, how does it locate the specific code that produces that protein. All of this must also have been created by a series of accidental mutations and survival of the fittest. What are the chances that these unobserved beneficial mutations really did this?

Imagine that 3 billion Aces, 3 billion Kings, 3 billion Queens and 3 billion Jacks are all arranged in thousands of different groups. If these cards were arranged in are in groups of four in one long line that is four cards thick and 3 billion cards long, the line of cards would circle the world approximately 6 times. The arrangement of these cards and the non-physical, purely logical language that they speak allegedly arose from accidental changes and dying animals in a process that cannot be replicated or observed. The chances of just 12 of those [the 3 billion] cards occurring in the correct order by chance is 1 in 479,001,600. This number may be hard to believe, but see for yourself – (1x2x3x4x5x6x7x8x9x10x11x12 ). Try it yourself.” – Charles Chesnutt.

Wie glo sulke snert wat deur die darwiniste opgedis word? Hoe kán hulle dit self wil glo? Tog sal hulle voortgaan. Waar is hulle integriteit?
Groete,
Kobus de Klerk