Litnet

Die voorkoms van bedrieglike evolusionisme is al so oud soos daardie religie self.

Ene Ernst Haeckel, een van Darwin se mees entoesiastiese ondersteuners, het al daarmee begin, Waar getuienis nie gevind kon word nie, is dit van ouds af, gefabriseer:
“Stephen J. Gould, professor of biology, geology, and the history of science at Harvard and the world’s leading supporter of the evolution myth, admitted in an article in the March, 2000 issue of Natural History:

‘Haeckel’s forceful, eminently comprehensible, IF NOT ALWAYS ACCURATE, books appeared in all major languages and surely exerted more influence than the works of any other scientist, including Darwin…in convincing people throughout the world about the validity of evolution’ - p. 42

To "prove" the greater myth of evolution, Haeckel invented the lesser myth known as "ontology recapitulates phylogeny." In a nutshell, he claimed that evolution was proved by the fact that, from its conception to its birth (or hatching), every animal passes through an evolutionary "climb" identical to the worldwide process of evolution from one-celled animals to advanced life-forms over eons of time. In other words, every animal embryo "evolves" from a microscopic mass of cells to a fish, then to an amphibian, then to a reptile, and so on. To prove his claim, Haeckel created numerous drawings of embryonic fish, salamanders, tortoises, chickens, pigs, dogs, and humans, all placed side by side. His drawings showed each species starting its fetal existence looking exactly like all the others, and then undergoing an individual evolutionary ascent identical to that which Darwin had proposed for the entire animal kingdom.

The problem with Haeckel’s "proof" of evolution was that his drawings were a hoax. Even Dr. Gould admitted that:-

‘Haeckel had exaggerated the similarities [between embryos of different species] by idealizations and omissions. He also, in some cases — in a procedure that can only be called fraudulent — simply copied the same figure over and over again.…Haeckel’s drawings never fooled expert embryologists, who recognized his fudgings right from the start (p. 44).”

Louis Agassiz was indertyd ’n professor in soölogie by Harvard en hy was ’n kreasionis. Hy is die eerste wat die Haeckel bedrog opgemerk het. Vandag sê die einste Gould daaroor:

“Agassiz generally sticks to the high road, despite ample provocation, by marshaling the facts of his greatest disciplinary expertise (in geology, paleontology, and zoology) to refute Haeckel’s frequent exaggerations and rhetorical inconsistencies. Agassiz may have been exhausted and discouraged, but he could still put up one whale of a fight, even if only in private (pp. 47-48).”
Maar moet nie dink dat deursnee evolusioniste die bedrogspul van Haeckel laat staan het, nie- weereens Gould aan die woord:

“Haeckel’s drawings, despite their noted inaccuracies, entered into the most impenetrable and permanent of all quasi-scientific literatures: standard student textbooks of biology (p. 44)….Once ensconced in textbooks, misinformation becomes cocooned and effectively permanent, because…textbooks copy from previous texts (p. 45).
Prof. Gould then made this absolutely startling admission:

…[W]e do, I think, have the right to be both astonished and ashamed by the century of mindless recycling that has led to the persistence of these drawings in a large number, IF NOT A MAJORITY, of modern textbooks! (p. 45) He then goes on to quote a colleague, Michael Richardson of the St. George’s Hospital Medical School in London, who stated, "I know of at least fifty recent biology texts which use the drawings uncritically" (p. 45)”.

Dan ook weer die talle sketse en voorstellings van die fabelagtige ‘evolusie’ van Pliopithecus, ’n klein apie, na A. africanus, die paar beentjies wat fabelagtig in ’n genus omskep is, dan deur tot

Solo Man en dan tot by die mens:

 As Lubenow summarizes, the parade “is raw propaganda—brilliant propaganda, but raw nonetheless” and few evolutionists have “protested this gross lack of scientific objectivity” shown in the Time-Life and other books. Yet this outrageous and raw propaganda has no doubt influenced millions of persons to accept the Darwinian worldview of human evolution and is, by far, the most popular icon of evolution that has been presented everywhere in the media for decades. The fact is, that “The once popular fresco showing a single file of marching hominids becoming ever more vertical, tall, and hairless now appears to be a fiction [J.J. Hublin, An evolutionary odyssey, Nature 403:363–364, 27 January 2000.]”

Daar is 'n paar evolusioniste wat die optrede van die hoofstroom nie kan uitstaan nie - hulle kan jy gewoonlik op die vingers van een hand tel.

Darwinistiese evolusie is 'n mite, 'n leuen - 'n hersenskim wat deur die aanhangers daarvan gebruik word as 'n religie ne filosofie, as teenreaksie teen die Christelike Godsdiens - en wanvoorstelling, bedrog en ernstige akademiese intimidasie is aan die orde van die dag. Wetenskap is dit beslis nie.

Skandelik! Maar, as die ouens wéét hulle is besig om ’n leuen te verkondig vir wetenskap, omdat dit vir hulle ’n saak van ernstige religie is om te probeer om Christendom daarmee teë te werk, dan is hulle tot enigiets in staat.

Groete,
Kobus de Klerk