Die Higgs-Boson

  • 2

As daar bewyse is vir die Higgs-Boson, waarom dit dan die God-partikel noem?

Groete

Angus

  • 2

Kommentaar

  • Angus

     
    Touché.
     
    Sovêr ek onthou was die term "god particle" 'n skepping van 'n oningeligte joernalis. Lyk alles oor god is die skepping van oningeligtes. 
     
    Thomas
     
  • Hello Angus, 

     
    Ek sien die humor en plaas tog die volgende in alle erns net vir die agtergrond tot hierdie en is 'n opstel uit die New York Times wat soos alles wat 'n mens by bly uitstaan: 
     
    Essay: What’s in a name?
    By Dennis Overbye   
     
    Parsing the "God particle," the ultimate metaphor We need to talk about the “God particle.”Recently in The New York Times, I reported on the attempts by various small armies of physicists to discover an elementary particle central to the modern conception of nature. Technically it’s called the Higgs boson, after Peter Higgs, an English physicist who conceived of it in 1964. It is said to be responsible for endowing the other elementary particles in the universe with mass. 
     
    In a stroke of either public relations genius or disaster, Leon M. Lederman, the former director of the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, or Fermilab, referred to the Higgs as “the God particle” in the book of the same name he published with the science writer Dick Teresi in 1993. 
     
    To Dr. Lederman, it made metaphorical sense, he explained in the book, because the Higgs mechanism made it possible to simplify the universe, resolving many different seeming forces into one, like tearing down the Tower of Babel. 
     
    Besides, his publisher complained, nobody had ever heard of the Higgs particle.
     
    In some superficial ways, the Higgs has lived up to its name. Several Nobel Prizes have been awarded for work on the so-called Standard Model, of which the Higgs is the central cog. Billions of dollars are being spent on particle accelerators and experiments to find it, inspect it, and figure out how it really works.
     
    But physicists groan when they hear it referred to as the “God particle” in newspapers and elsewhere (and the temptation to repeat it, given science reporters’ desperate need for colorful phrases in an abstract and daunting field, is irresistible). 
     
    Even when these physicists approve of what you have written about their craft, they grumble that the media are engaging in sensationalism, or worse.
     
    As it happened, Dr. Lederman’s book came out about the time that creationism was on the rise in this country, and “my colleagues gave me hell,” as he put it in a recent e-mail message.Neither time nor criticism seems to have dimmed Dr. Lederman’s taste for metaphor or sense of humor. 

    Only two weeks ago, he titled an article about particle physics “The God Particle, Et Al.” Well, OK, he had a book to sell.It’s not easy to stand up for a moniker as over the top as the one that Dr. Lederman used—one we are likely to hear again and again in the next couple of years as the generation-long hunt for the Higgs particle reaches a climax. 

    But I have to applaud Dr. Lederman’s spirit. Historians have suggested that it was a mistake for the antiwar movement of the 1960s to yield the flag—a powerful symbol of patriotism—to the war’s supporters, and likewise I think it would be a mistake for scientists to yield such a powerful metaphor to creationists and religious fundamentalists.

    The Higgs particle is not God, but as theorized it is a piece of the sublime beauty of nature that had Einstein figuratively on his knees.

    Dennis Overbye is a correspondent for The New York Times, which published this essay on August 7, 2007. Copyright 2007, The New York Times. All rights reserved. Reprinted with permission. 
  • Reageer

    Jou e-posadres sal nie gepubliseer word nie. Kommentaar is onderhewig aan moderering.


     

    Top